Orchestrating GeoServer with Docker and Fig
Posted by: Gavin Fleming | in Docker, FOSSGIS, GeoServer, PostGIS | 10 years ago | 3 comments

In this article I will detail how to set up a simple orchestrated system of docker containers using:

    • PostGIS

    • GeoServer

    • Docker

    • Fig


We assume that you already have a working knowledge of Geoserver and PostGIS in this article. Docker is a tool that allows you to run applications in containers which are isolated from the host system. One of the great things about docker is that you can publish pre-made recipes for applications in their central repository. At Kartoza.com we publish a number of docker containers on at https://registry.hub.docker.com/repos/kartoza/.

Fig is an orchestration tool for docker that lets you define and manage your service definitions. To define our orchestrated services we can simply make use of our published postgis and geoserver containers, and then use docker's volumes features to persist the data directories (postgis cluster and geoserver data_dir) so that the services can be brought up and down while maintaining their state. The service definitions are specified in a file called fig.yml. The first thing I will do is create a python virtual environment and install fig into it:

virtualenv venv
source venv/bin/activate
pip install fig


 

First lets define our database service in fig.yml:

db:
image: kartoza/postgis
hostname: postgis
volumes:
- ./postgres_data:/var/lib/postgresql
environment:
- USERNAME=docker
- PASS=docker


Our service is called 'db' and we mount a directory into the container as /var/lib/postgresql - our database cluster will be initialised there, and we define environment variables which will be used to set up a postgres user. By default our PostGIS image initialises a database called 'gis' with the postgis extensions installed into it. Next we define a geoserver service in fig.yml:

geoserver:
image: kartoza/geoserver
hostname: geoserver
volumes:
- ./geoserver_data:/opt/geoserver/data_dir
links:
- db:db


This mounts a directory from the host into /opt/geoserver/data_dir - which is the location geoserver will write its configuration data to. Additionally we specify a dependency on the db container - fig will ensure the db service gets spun up before the geoserver container. You will also be able to reference the database as hostname 'db' when creating a pg data store in postgis. So let's bring up our containers using 'fig up' (which in this case will simply download them from our kartoza collection of images on http://hub.docker.com). You will see output something like this:

(venv)timlinux@confluence:~/dev/docker/geoserver-deploy$ fig up -d
Creating geoserverdeploy_db_1...
Creating geoserverdeploy_geoserver_1...
Pulling image kartoza/geoserver...
81b64d1002ff: Pulling dependent layers
3f65ffc88c79: Pulling dependent layers
511136ea3c5a: Download complete
...
...


 

The '-d' flag puts the services into the background. You can check out this repo: https://github.com/timlinux/geoserver-deploy if you want to get the project used in this article. See the fig documentation for other things you can do once your service is running - fig basically lets you manage the suite of services as a single unit, bringing them up or down with a single command.

Once up and running you can find out the IP address of the geoserver container like this:

docker inspect geoserverdeploy_db_1 | grep IPAddress
"IPAddress": "172.17.0.5",


Once you have the IP address, simply connect to it on port 8080 in your web browser e.g.: http://172.17.0.5:8080 - which should present you with the normal geoserver log in screen (user: admin, password: geoserver).

In the screenshot below you can see how we can connect to the postgis service from within the geoserver service by using the host 'db' and database 'gis' for the connection details.

With a basic architecture like this in place, you can start to mix in other docker services to create more complete architectures. For example, try adding in our btsync (https://registry.hub.docker.com/u/kartoza/btsync/) image so that you can synchronise GIS data files and geoserver config files between different hosts. This is one approach you could take to scaling up your services to run on multiple services - or to let you design your work on a local workstation and have those changes synced to your server automatically. You can also use fig to scale a service on a single server - in effect running multiple copies of e.g. geoserver:

fig scale geoserver=3


Which would then show 3 instances of geoserver running in docker ps:

CONTAINER ID IMAGE COMMAND CREATED STATUS PORTS NAMES
fb678b33a199 kartoza/geoserver:latest "\"/bin/sh -c \"/opt 6 seconds ago Up 5 seconds 8080/tcp geoserverdeploy_geoserver_3
6997c0ea15e4 kartoza/geoserver:latest "\"/bin/sh -c \"/opt 6 seconds ago Up 5 seconds 8080/tcp geoserverdeploy_geoserver_2
6801c32fa006 kartoza/geoserver:latest "\"/bin/sh -c \"/opt About a minute ago Up About a minute 8080/tcp geoserverdeploy_geoserver_1
1e3cdd1e8dec kartoza/postgis:latest "/bin/sh -c /start-p About a minute ago Up About a minute 5432/tcp geoserverdeploy_db_1


 

If you put an nginx proxy in front of geoserver, you can then get it to round robin requests between the geoserver instances to form a simple load balancer (though I would suggest consulting the geoserver docs / community to see if this would be an effective way to scale up a geoserver service).

 

Using docker can massivily improve the felxibility and repeatibility with which you deploy services - and there are a growing number of geospatial  docker images out there - if you are keen on FOSSGIS, exploring docker will be well worth your while!

 

Current rating: 1.7

Comments

Orchestrating GeoServer with Docker and Fig | Geo- 10 years ago

[…] http://kartoza.com/orchestrating-geoserver-with-docker-and-fig/ […]

Link | Reply
Currently unrated

Luke Swart 10 years ago

Thanks for the post! Your Geoserver Docker repo has been very helpful, perhaps I will try out Fig as well. I hear Fig is useful for managing multiple containers.

Link | Reply
Currently unrated

Tim Sutton 9 years, 11 months ago

Hi Luke

Thanks for your comment - yes fig is certainly worth a closer look. I've been migrating from using bash scripts for orchestration to using fig. Fig still has some issues e.g. no --restart option, forced naming of images. But for most use cases you will find it a pretty good choice.

Link | Reply
Currently unrated

New Comment

required

required (not published)

optional

required

Have a question? Get in touch!